LANGUAGE POLICIES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR PEACE
By
Dr. Tariq Rahman
National Distinguished Professor (Pakistan)
LANGUAGE POLICY AND LANGUAGE PLANNING
(LP AND LP)
Ø
Status
Planning
Ø
National
Language
Ø
Medium
of instruction
Ø
Official
Language
Ø
Corpus
Planning
Ø
Script
Ø
Norms
of Usage
Ø
Words
Ø
Spellings
Ø
Acquisition
Planning
Ø
Teaching
Ø
Spread
REVERSING LANGUAGE SHIFT (RLS)
Ø
Functional
changes in Language use.
Ø
RLS
is prescriptive
Ø
Language
death (death, murder or suicide?)
Ø
Globalization
and Threat to Languages.
Ø
Domains
of Language use.
Ø
Public
(Power)
Ø
Private
(Pleasure)
Ø
Problems
with RLS

LANGUAGE POLICY OF INDIA-1
Ø
Hindi
as National Language (1950 Constitution)
Ø
English
as Official Language up to 1965.
Ø
Linguistic
States-27 Nov 1947 speech.
Ø
Dar
commission, 10 Dec 1948 ‘No new provinces should be created for the present.
All things considered, the consideration of linguistic provinces should be
postponed for ten years’ (Report of the
Linguistic Provinces Commission).
Ø
Andhra
Question: Sriramulu’s fast to death on 16 Dec 1952. 01 Oct 1953, Andhra
(TELUGU) state created. Andhra Pradesh with Hyderabad as capital created on 01
Nov 1956.
Ø
Report of the States
Reorganization Commission (1955) in 267 pages.
LANGUAGE POLICY OF INDIA-2
Ø
Language
States
Ø
Bilingual
States of Bombay (Gujrati and Marathi) Bombay city went to Maharashtra
Ø
Punjab
Partitioned in 1966.
Ø
Himachal
Pradesh
Ø
Haryana
(Hindi)
Ø
Punjab
(Punjabi)
Ø
Policy
About English
Ø
Hindi
opposed by Dravidian India.
Ø
Hindi
subverted by the upper classes all over India.
Ø
Nehru’s
support of English as a link language (LWC) and a modernizing language.
Ø
English
stays beyond 1965 and is deeply entrenched.
Ø
Three
language formula.
Ø
Language
and religion (Urdu-Muslim; Punjabi-Sikh; Hindi-Hindu).

LANGUAGE POLICY OF PAKISTAN
Ø
Ethnicity
and Language
Ø
Bengali
Language movement
Ø
Sindhi
Language movement
Ø
Pashto
Language movement
Ø
Siraiki
Language movement
Ø
Balochi/Brahvi
Language movement
Ø
Punjabi
Language movement
Ø
English
and the class divide.

LANGUAGE POLICY IN SRI LANKA
Ø
Official
Language Act of 1958
Ø
Sinhala
becomes the official language.
Ø
Tamils
resent this.
Ø
Tamil
ethnicity asserts itself.
Ø
English
competence decreases and English-medium schooling decreases till 1977 when the
trend is reversed.
Ø
Tamil
becomes an official language under the 1978 constitution. The accord is
certified on 14 Nov 1987. English becomes a link language.


CATALAN IN SPAIN
Ø
Catalonia
opposed Franco in the 1936 Civil War.
Ø
Catalan
was suppressed.
Ø
In
the later years of Franco superficial concessions were made to Catalan.
Ø
In
1996 the entire population could understand Catalan. 3 out of 4 (nearly 4
million) could speak it.
Ø
In
1998, 97% of the population of Catalonia could speak and write Spanish.
Ø
The
1983 law for Linguistic Normalization of Catalan gave it a key role in
education at all levels.
Ø
Catalan
is used in government but not necessarily in business.
CATALAN (LEGISLATION)
SPANISH CONSTITUTION (1978)
Ø
STATUS
Planning
Ø
Official
language in Catalonia (Article 3)
Ø
Spanish
and Catalan co-equal official language.
Ø
CORPUS
Planning
Ø
Dictionaries
Ø
Grammars
Ø
ACQUISITION
Planning
Ø
1988
Law
Ø
Knowing
both official languages
Ø
To
freely use either of the two official languages in all fields.
Ø No discrimination.


FLEMISH
Ø
Flemish
nationalism focused on language.
Ø
In
1830 Flemish (Dutch) was established as the medium of instruction at the
University of Gent.
Ø
Linguistic
frontier established between Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels in 1963.
Ø
In
1994-95 there was a Flemish-Walloon conflict but it was resolved peacefully.
Ø
Flemish
language-based political power is recognized.
Ø The idea that two PEOPLE live in ONE STATE is accepted and has removed the possibility of conflict or secession.

CANADA
Ø
French-speakers
were a minority (28%) in Canada in 1961.
Ø
The
Gendron Commission (1972) declared that French could be greatly weakened in
Quebec.
Ø
Immigrants
(Allophones) taught English to their children.
Ø
Between
1969 to 1996 Quebec governments made laws favouring French.
Ø
Status
planning, corpus planning and acquisition planning laws were made so that a
shift in favour of French by 1996 was visible. Quebec did not secede from
Canada.